FALL
2007 HONORS COURSES
HONR 218L Language and Mind
Tuesday/Thursday, 9:30-10:45 a.m.
Professor Norbert Hornstein, Department of Linguistics
Fish swim, birds fly, people speak. No one would think
to deny that fish are biologically built for swimming and birds for
flying. Nature has genetically endowed these creatures with special-purpose
faculties which undergird these capacities. Linguists have argued for
the past twenty-five years that the same holds for humans and language,
in particular, that humans have a specific genetically-endowed dedicated
capacity to acquire and use language. The aim of this course is to investigate
the evidence for this claim.
We consider several types of evidence. The first part
focuses on the logical problem of language acquisition. What evidentiary
problems does the child face in acquiring its native language? What
is the object acquired? What's a grammar? What evidence does a child
use in building its grammar? To help get a handle on these rather abstract
questions, we consider how kids come to acquire the grammars that they
do by investigating some grammatical constructions in detail and formulating
the rules that native speakers tacitly employ in judging various properties
of these constructions. We then work backwards to figure out how knowledge
of these constructions and rules could be attained by the child. What
sort of innate endowment (if any) is required to get the child from
its initial state of ignorance to the final state of grammatical competence.
What sort of evidence does it have access to? What sort of data can
it use in acquiring its native language?
Next we examine data from other areas that bear on this
issue. We take a look at some child language data, neurolinguistic data,
cross species data, the language of feral (wild) children, historical
linguistic data, and cross species linguistic data. The goal is to see
how much consilience there is between the conclusions arrived at by
grammatical investigation and those arrived at by other means.
CORE–Humanities [HO]